No one enters a marriage thinking that it will end someday. But for many, divorce becomes a reality. And when it happens, it can be overwhelming, leaving you anxious and uncertain about the entire process. One of the biggest decisions you will face is choosing between fault-based and no-fault divorce. Understanding the difference between these two approaches can help you make an informed decision that protects your interests.
Mia Poppe, Esq.Managing Partner
Fault-based divorce: Understanding accountability
In New York, a fault-based divorce requires proving that one spouse has committed a wrongdoing, such as adultery, abandonment or cruel and inhuman treatment. This approach may provide a sense of justice or closure, and can be used as leverage in negotiations. However, it can be costly and time consuming, with no guarantee for a favorable outcome.No-fault divorce: Focusing on resolution
A no-fault divorce, also known as an "irretrievable breakdown" divorce, does not require proving wrongdoing. Instead, you must demonstrate that your marriage has broken down beyond repair, and that you have been living apart for at least one year. This approach is often faster and less expensive than a fault-based divorce, and can reduce conflict and emotional distress. However, it may not provide a sense of accountability for one’s actions. A no-fault divorce may also not impact spousal maintenance or property distribution.Protecting your interests
As you consider your options, it is essential to prioritize your needs and concerns. Ask yourself:- What are my goals for the divorce process?
- What are my concerns about the impact of divorce on my life, business or reputation?
- What are my priorities for the distribution of assets and property?
Mia Poppe, Esq.Managing Partner
